美容醫學與消費者保護法的距離【本期企劃】 試閱
The Distance between Aesthetic Medicine and Consumer Protection Law
在美容醫學廣受歡迎的今日，因其而起的糾紛數量，於近年來也可見有相應上升之趨勢。從而如何在現行法規之框架下，就映射出的法律爭議予以適切評價，不論係對於提供美容醫學服務者、或有意接受者而言，均具有高度切身性。其中，有關「美容醫學是否有適用消費者保護法之餘地」的問題，和美容醫學是否屬於醫療行為、美容醫學與以治療為目的之醫療行為間有何差異等概念之釐清，實存在著環環相銜之關聯。本文即聚焦於此，並以學說和司法實務之見解為據，嘗試進行簡要的解析。
In today’s age where aesthetic medicine is very popular, the number of disputes arising therefrom has also shown a corresponding upward trend in recent years. Therefore, how to appropriately evaluate the legal disputes reflected under the framework of the current laws and regulations is highly relevant to those who provide aesthetic medicine services or those who intend to receive them. Among them, the question of “whether aesthetic medicine has room for the application of the consumer protection law,” and whether aesthetic medicine is a medical practice, and the clarification on the difference between aesthetic medicine and medical practice for the purpose of treatment, etc., are related by many connections. With this as a focus, and understanding of law in an academic setting and law in practice as basis, this article attempts to make a brief analysis.
032-045
