篇名

【醫療民、刑事法】舟狀骨骨折誤診案:中西醫學之交錯【學習式判解評析】   試閱

並列篇名

The Interaction of the Chinese and the Western Medical Science: The Case of a Misdiagnosis of the Fracture of Scaphoid

作者
中文摘要

本案原告因車禍造成右腿受傷,送往被告醫院急診,由取得醫師證書僅3個月餘之住院醫師診治,雖針對右足踝拍攝X光片,但未診斷出有右足舟狀骨骨折。嗣原告至同院中醫傷科,先後由兩位被告中醫師,於不知原告有骨折之診斷下,以傷科手法及外敷膏藥治療共3個多月,後始由他院醫師診斷為右足舟狀骨陳舊性骨折併癒合不良。原告就業務過失傷害罪提起自訴並附帶民事求償。兩位評論作者即針對醫師的年資能力與組織醫療責任、中醫師之X光判讀權限及轉診義務、結果預見可能與會診轉診義務、團隊醫療與信賴原則及其限制等議題提出探討。

英文摘要

Getting injuries on his right leg, being sent into the emergency room in the hospital, the plaintiff in this case was treat by a R1 which got the certificate only for 3 months. Even though the R1 took an X-Ray for his right leg, he still didn’t diagnose the fracture of scaphoid on the right leg. After going to the department of Chinese Medicine and taking treatments by 2 Chinese medicine practitioners as the accused. Without knowing the fracture of scaphoid, they treated the plaintiff traumatologic diagnosis and ointments for more than 3 months. The plaintiff was diagnosed with the old fracture of scaphoid with bad union by the other physician in another hospital in the end. The plaintiff complained therefore the 2 Chinese medicine practitioners about the injury of vocational negligence and the civil compensation. The 2 authors would like to discuss many topics in this case, like the seniority and the capacity of the physician, the responsibility of medical organization, the authority of judging the X-Ray by the Chinese medicine practitioner and the duty of referral, the possibility of the consequent-foreseeing and the duty of the consultation and the referral, team medical, the legitimate expectation and its limitation.

起訖頁

061-090

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062017100012006  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP