篇名

【醫療刑事法】再審無罪案:蒼天啊! 我不認!【學習式判解評析】   試閱

並列篇名

Retrial of Guilty: Innocent After Retrial Want the Heaven Knows I'll Never Give Up

作者
中文摘要

服務於A醫院的醫師甲,為車禍受傷的病人乙進行診治,甲醫師應詳細注意其病情,卻疏於在術後施作血管攝影,使乙於數日後轉院治療而須面臨右下肢截肢手術之結果。一審地方法院認被告甲醫師之醫療行為並無醫療常規之違反,至二審高等法院則指甲醫師疏於注意而未善盡觀察照護義務,判決甲醫師因業務上之過失傷害人致重傷,處有期徒刑4月,如易科罰金,以新臺幣1,000元折算1日。甲醫師於二審判決確定後,遂向臺灣高等法院提起再審,直至第三次聲請,高等法院以甲醫師所提之鑑定意見與卷內各項證據資料綜合判斷之,確實具有動搖原判決確定事實之蓋然性,故為開始再審之裁定。值此契機,本文立於實證視野,先收集歷來臺灣醫療過失之刑事訴訟判決,並嘗試與日本互為對照執業醫師之被告比率及有罪比率;再就醫師於醫療過失刑事判決確定後聲請再審之裁定結果為整理,釐清何以本案能成為同類判決中,開啟再審救濟大門的先例。

英文摘要

A 14 years old boy suffered from a traffic accident and resulted in right lower leg injury. Fasciotomy was performed by the accused surgeon. Amputation of the right leg was performed due to translocation of the knee with compression of the popliteal artery after transferring to another hospital. Not guilty was judged by the district court because of no ischemia of the leg while cared by the defendant doctor. However, this surgeon was judged to be guilty by the high court due to ischemia with tissue necrosis were found before transferring. After the third successfully request for retrial, this surgeon was judged innocence. We found that, from 2000 to 2018, 569 medical physicians in Taiwan were accused by the criminal prosecution and 115 doctors were judged guilty. At the same time period, there were 21 requests for retrial and only this case was approved for retrial and announced to be not guilty.

起訖頁

055-077

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062020100048005  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP