<br /><strong>【相关论着】</strong> <br />▶<a href="http://www.angle.com.tw/book.asp?BKID=8544" target="_blank">不公平竞争诉讼赢的策略—智慧财产法院判决分析／林佳莹</a> <br />▶<a href="http://www.angle.com.tw/book.asp?BKID=8328" target="_blank">知识产权法／谢铭洋</a> <br />▶<a href="http://www.angle.com.tw/book.asp?BKID=7976" target="_blank">智财拼图竞赛－发明要顺应人性／许履尘</a> <br />▶<a href="http://www.angle.com.tw/book.asp?BKID=8141" target="_blank">设计产品的智能财产权保护／林佳莹</a> <br />更多相关图书论着请至【元照网络书店】：<a href="http://www.angle.com.tw/layer.asp? bkid_1=3410&KindID3=3458" target="_blank">http://www.angle.com.tw/message.asp</a> <br />
<div><br /></div>
<div><span style="font-weight: bold;">【内容简介】</span> </div>
<div>主题一：Leading Patent Cases of 2015 </div>
<div>报告人：Robert J. Benson／Orrick,Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP </div>
<div>讲 纲： </div>
<div>(1)Background: Section 112(f) </div>
<div>(2) Williamson Reverses Precedent and Returns to Original Standard of Presumption </div>
<div>(3) 35 U.S.C. §112(f) Analysis </div>
<div>(4) Factual Background </div>
<div>(5) Implications of Commil </div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>主题二：Current Trends in IP Litigation </div>
<div>报告人：I. Neel Chatterjee／Orrick,Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP </div>
<div>讲 纲： </div>
<div>(1) Inter Partes Review </div>
<div>(2) Synopsys v. Lee:Is the UPSTO allowed to do partial institution? </div>
<div>(3) 35 U.S.C §101 </div>
<div>(4) Attorney Fee Motions:Highmark and Octane Fitness </div>
<div>(5) New Battleground:Remedies</div>
