查詢結果
共有 57 筆符合條件的資料
| 序號 | 篇名 | 作者 | 日期 | 期刊 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 【醫療刑事法】腹腔鏡膽囊切除手術失誤案:腹腔鏡膽囊切除術誤截斷總肝管案【學習式判解評析】 Error in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Inadvertent Amputation of Common Hepatic Duct |
黃則瑜 | 2025/07 | 月旦醫事法報告 |
| 2 | 【醫療刑事法】腹腔鏡膽囊切除手術失誤案:併發症之迷思【學習式判解評析】 Error in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Debunking the Myth of Medical Complication |
吳志正 | 2025/07 | 月旦醫事法報告 |
| 3 | 【醫療刑事法】醫美洢蓮絲注射案:法官如何驗證鑑定內容為真【學習式判解評析】 Litigation of EllANSÉ Injection in Aesthetic Medical Practice: How the Judge verifies the Authenticity of Expert Examination |
廖建瑜 | 2025/05 | 月旦醫事法報告 |
| 4 | 【醫療刑事法】醫美洢蓮絲注射案:洢蓮絲注射風險與醫療常規之界線【學習式判解評析】 Litigation of ELLANSÉ Injection in Aesthetic Medical Practice: Reassessing the Legal Boundaries of ELLANSÉ Injection and Medical Standards of Care |
張濱璿 | 2025/05 | 月旦醫事法報告 |
| 5 | 【醫療刑事法】穿戴裝置醫療認定之界限──COMGO案:如何判斷是否屬於醫療器材【學習式判解評析】 The Limit of Indentification of Wearable Devices as Medical Treatment: The Case COMGO——How to Categorize an Item into Medical Devices |
廖建瑜 | 2025/03 | 月旦醫事法報告 |
| 6 | 【醫療刑事法】穿戴裝置醫療認定之界限──COMGO案:醫療器材之認定標準與間接故意之判斷難題【學習式判解評析】 The Limit of Indentification of Wearable Devices as Medical Treatment: The Case COMGO—— The Identification Standards of Medical Devices and the Difficulty in Judging Dolus Indirectus |
楊廼軒 | 2025/03 | 月旦醫事法報告 |
| 7 | 【醫療刑事法】肌肉鬆弛劑致死案:論醫療行為與保證人地位【學習式判解評析】 The Muscle Relaxant Case: Comment on Medical Practice and the Status of Duty to Act |
崔恩寧 | 2024/10 | 月旦醫事法報告 |
| 8 | 【醫療刑事法】肌肉鬆弛劑致死案:不作為醫療過失致死之因果歸責【學習式判解評析】 The Muscle Relaxant Case: On the Objective Attribution for the Medical Negligent Homicide by Omission |
林書楷 | 2024/10 | 月旦醫事法報告 |
| 9 | 【醫療刑事法】專斷或選擇—卵巢切除案:論多重醫療選擇與醫師告知說明義務【學習式判解評析】 Arbitrary or Choice: The Oophorectomy Case-On Multiple Medical Options and Doctors’ Obligation to Inform and Explain |
古承宗 | 2024/08 | 月旦醫事法報告 |
| 10 | 【醫療刑事法】專斷或選擇—卵巢切除案:違反醫療選項同意之刑事責任【學習式判解評析】 Arbitrary or Choice-The Oophorectomy Case: Criminal Liability for Breach of Consent for medical Options |
廖建瑜 | 2024/08 | 月旦醫事法報告 |

