美容醫學民事訴訟中「美」之認定及賠償範圍之判準【醫法新論】 試閱
The Definition of “ Beauty ” and the Judgement Criteria of “ Damages ” in Aesthetic Medical Malpractice Litigation
於美容醫學之醫療糾紛,對於「美」的認定,向來有難以認定之問題存在,本文就「主觀之不滿意」和「客觀之不好結果」兩層面來探討目前我國司法實務對於美容醫學之瑕疵認定。並就法院對美容醫學糾紛之賠償如何審理與運作,進一步整理與說明,為美容醫療糾紛提供更妥適的解決之道。
How to define “beauty” plays a critical role in medical malpractice litigation concerning aesthetic medicine. However, only few theorists and learned judges have devoted themselves to this topic trying to frame practically sound principles, and very limited success has been achieved. This article probed into the definition of “defective outcome” in the field of aesthetic medical malpractice decisions, with special reference to the two parameters, naming “not being subjectively satisfied” and “obtaining objectively unfavorable outcome.” Also investigated was how the damages and solatium were decided by the court. Hopefully, this article will help in aesthetic medical malpractice litigation to elucidate not only the intriguing concept of “beauty” and “defective outcome,” but also the way how to determine the damages and solatium, and to set up a clear-cut criteria to settle these disputes therein.
179-206