Its no necessary for the Patient and his Litigation Attorney to have Professional Medical Knowledge
Many operations of hip in two hospitals caused the Infection of bacteria, therefore the patient accused the doctors that they operated in error, didn’t follow the hygiene rules, and so caused the serious infection, for the property and compensation and spiritual.
The supreme court thought that the patient was unexpected to have professional medical knowledges, so his burden of proof was requested moderately. Therefore, the patient had no obligation to explain the concrete cause of infection. Furthermore, the court didn’t hire an expert, which was necessary in this case, to investigate whether the operation followed the hygiene rules, so misconducted in the procedure.