醫療糾紛處理之法律經濟分析【實務家手札】 試閱
The Economic Analysis of Law in Medical Lawsuits
近20年來,病人就醫後發生不利之結果,時有對醫師提起刑事與民事訴訟者,導致現有所謂「五大皆空」之譏,本文透過法律經濟分析之觀點,無論以需求法則、成本效益分析及比較利益法則等角度出發,均可發現調解機制為醫療糾紛處理最適之資源配置。本文認為,臺灣已於2000年民事訴訟法修正時,於第403條第1項第7款明定民事醫療糾紛採行調解前置主義,今日正是運用非訟制度解決醫療糾紛之時機,並藉此符合法律經濟分析之本質─即滿足司法資源配置之效率。
In the past two decades, patients who had a disadvantageous consequence after seeking medical advice filed a criminal or civil action. “empty of five divisions” comes now as the result. With the viewpoint of the economic analysis of law, including law of demand, cost-benefit analysis and comparative advantage, this article discovers that the mediation would be optimum allocation of resources in medical lawsuits. The Thesis in this article is that Non-Contentious could be useful for medical lawsuits nowadays, because the mediation, after amending Civil Procedure Law in 2000, must be taken before filing a civil action according to paragraph 403 section 1 number 7 Civil Procedure Law, By doing so, the aim of the economic of law, the efficiency of juridical resource allocation, could be practiced.
165-177