篇名

醫療賠償訴訟之請求權基礎【本期企劃】   免費試閱

並列篇名

The Claim Right for Compensation in Medical Litigations

作者
中文摘要

醫療賠償訴訟之原告常依據侵權行為與債務不履行之法律關係為請求權基礎,法院訴訟實務如何區別看待此二請求權基礎?其法律要件或效果是否有不同?又此複數請求權基礎尚涉及醫師、醫療機構等不同責任主體,尤其我國最高法院肯認法人得依民法第184條規定自負侵權行為責任後,是否會有不同?均是饒富趣味之法律問題。

英文摘要

Plaintiff take tort and non-performance of obligation usually as the claim right for the compensation in medical litigations. The following would be interesting questions: how does the court on the viewpoint of legal praxis differ and deal with these two claim rights? Are their legal elements or effects different? Since Supreme Court hold that a juristic person could have obligation of tort according to paragraph 184 Civil Law, would both of the claim rights above be different, when they are about different subjects bearing obligations like the physicians or the medical institutions?

起訖頁

030-048

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062021060056002  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP