篇名

負責醫師容留非法執行業務人員案:論負責醫師於員工非法執行業務時之保證人地位【學習式判解評析】   免費試閱

並列篇名

A Case about a Physician in Charge of a Medical Institution Having Duty of Care

作者
中文摘要

本文係對於臺灣高等法院109年度醫上易字第3號刑事確定判決之介紹與簡評,依該判決就被告即醫療機構負責醫師於容留未具執行物理治療業務資格人員,非法執行物理治療業務是否具保證人義務地位部分論述予以分析及評釋。

英文摘要

This essay would be an introduction as well as a comment for the appealed judgment for the medical criminal judgment No. 3 in 2020 Taiwan High Court which is forbidden appealing to the third instance. According to it, a physician in charge of a medical institution as the accused employed a stuff member who didn’t have any qualification for practicing the physical therapy. The topic being analyzed and commented in the essay would be whether it would have duty of care to practice physical therapy illegally.

起訖頁

096-109

出版單位
DOI

10.53106/241553062021070057007  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP