| 議程 |
| 時間／場次 |
主題 |
| 13:20-13:40 |
報到 |
第一場
13:40-15:10 |
聯邦巡迴上訴法院
美國專利之新案例 |
- - 專利訴訟審理地點 Venue 變更之新案例
- - 多方復審 Patent Trial and Appeal Board 新案例
- - An update on case law following Oil States Energy Service, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, SAS Institute v. Iancu, and Federal Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal during proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
- - Patent Venue questions remaining after TC Heartland v. Kraft
Foods& impact on foreign corporations, In re HTC Corp. (Fed Cir. 2018).
|
人工智慧 AI 專利發明
屬性與可專利適格性 Patentability 之新趨勢 |
- - AI 學習算法能使用訓練獲得的創造力構想新發明
- - 專利申請時 inventorship 的考慮因素：誰是發明人？
- - 業界使用 AI 時可能構成專利故意侵權或引誘侵權？
(1) particularly whether AI inventions can meet the requirements
for patentable subject matter. AI is capable of generating inventive ideas and helping draft patent applications, encroaching on subjects that have historically required human input and ingenuity; or
(2) Potential liability for infringement by AI technologies, and whether such infringement could ever be “willful”; or whether AI technology could
trigger liability for induced infringement. Loop AI Lab, Inc. case
|
| 15:10-15:30 |
Break |
第二場
15:30-17:10 |
營業秘密訴訟案──
UMC 聯電與中國廠商
因中美貿易大戰在美被告
經濟間諜法案 |
- - U.S. v. UMC & Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit, Co., Ltd
- - 加州營業秘密相關民刑事案例解析 Uber Tech trade secret case
Waymo LLC v. Uber
- - U.S. v. Lam et al, and Genentech v. JHL Biotech, Inc.
- - 台商與中國公司經商如何避免聯邦營業秘密法律風險 18 USC
§1836 和加州民事法令 Cal Civ. Code § 3426
- - Introduction to California trade secret law, the rise of Federal Trade Litigation and Lessons learned from US Department of Justice’s indictment of UMC and other Chinese companies for theft of
trade secret and economic espionage; potential criminal penalties.
- - 經濟間諜罪：面臨刑事起訴的後果與因應之道
|
| Q&A |
| 我要報名 |
※本場免費(價值：3000元)，名額有限，欲報從速。
※報名人數屆滿，將關閉報名系統。
|
|
