國外（牙）醫畢業生實習容額分配適法性案：衛福部公告國外醫牙學歷臨床實習容額之適法性【學習式判解評析】 試閱
Case Concerning the Legality of the Allocation of Internship Quotas for Foreign (Dental) Medical Graduates: The Legality of the Ministry of Health and Welfare's Announcement of Clinical Practical Training Quotas for Overseas Medical and Dental Graduates
本案判決涉及衛生福利部依據國外醫學及牙醫學畢業生臨床實作訓練選配分發作業要點，逐年公告國外學歷畢業生得申請臨床實作訓練容額，其適法性之判斷。原告A為國外牙醫學畢業生，經第一階段牙醫師考試及格後，申請臨床實作訓練遭衛生福利部否准，遂提起行政訴訟。本案判決認為，醫師法已經就應考資格等重要事項予以規定，則其他屬於執行法律之細節性與技術性次要事項，衛生福利部得發布命令為必要之規定。衛生福利部依醫師法施行細則及國外醫學及牙醫學畢業生臨床實作訓練選配分發作業要點選配分發作業要點，考量醫事人力規劃之完整性、避免醫事人力供需失衡，以及國內醫療教學資源有限等因素，採取總額管控機制，逐年公告訓練名額，核為執行醫師法第4條，所為細節性與技術性事項，尚無違反法律保留原則、授權明確性原則。
Guidelines for the Selection and Distribution of Clinical Practical Training for Foreign Medical and Dental Graduates. Plaintiff A, a foreign-trained dental graduate who passed the first stage of the dentist qualification examination, was denied clinical practical training by the Ministry and subsequently filed an administrative lawsuit. The court held that while the Physician Act regulates important matters such as examination qualifications, the Ministry may issue necessary regulations on minor, detailed, and technical matters for the execution of the law. Pursuant to the Enforcement rules for Physicians Act and the aforementioned Guidelines, the Ministry implemented a total quota control mechanism—announcing training quotas annually—based on factors including comprehensive healthcare manpower planning, prevention of workforce imbalances, and limited domestic medical training resources. This measure constitutes a detailed and technical implementation of Article 4 of the Physician Act and does not violate the principle of legal reservation or the requirement for clear legislative authorization.
063-086
