篇名

延誤治療與相當因果關係──以民、刑事醫療判決之比較為核心【本期企劃】   試閱

並列篇名

Missed Treatment Opportunities and Adequate Causality─ Focus on the Comparison of Civil and Criminal Medical Judgments

作者
中文摘要

延誤治療時機在醫療案件中,可以說是至為核心的案例類型,未能及時醫治的不作為,其與結果之間的因果關係應如何判斷,更是其中的關鍵。經過初步的比較與分析,除了可以看出我國民、刑事法院均以相當因果關係進行檢驗,兩者的判斷模式基本上相同之外,也藉由考察最高法院107年度台上字第4587號刑事判決,指出刑事法院在判斷的思考上已出現放棄必然性要求的傾向,這一點與學說對於相當因果關係的理解相近。而仍值得探討的問題是,按照實務意見,所擬檢視的因果關係,是以規範所要求之作為與結果之間的關聯性為判斷對象,此種做法是否符合相當因果關係的學理,有待商榷。

英文摘要

Delaying the timing of treatment can be said to be the core case type in medical cases, and how to judge the causal relationship between the omission and the results that are not diagnosed and treated in time is the key. After a preliminary comparison and analysis, the civil and criminal courts of our country have conducted tests based on adequate causality, and the judgments of the two are basically the same. But criminal courts tend to abandon the requirement of necessity in their judgmental thinking, which is similar to the doctrine’s understanding of adequate causality. The question that remains to be explored is what is being examined in such cases. In our country’s practice, what should be assumed and what should be done is used as the object of judgment to test whether there is a adequate causal relationship between it and the result. It is doubtful whether such an approach is consistent with the theory of adequate causality.

起訖頁

030-039

出版單位
DOI

10.53106/241553062022080070003  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP