【智財刑事法】味全混油案:再論詐欺罪之「行使詐術」要件【學習式判解評析】 試閱
2013 Taiwan Food Scandal: On the Fraud-Exercising as the Element of Fraudulent
智慧財產法院日前就味全混油案作成判決,該院合議庭認定被告等人是否該當刑法詐欺取財罪之構成要件,其要件涵攝之重點聚焦在「行使詐術」。事實上,在不同類型的行業中,詐欺行為有其相異之樣態,故有必要觀察、參考在被告實施犯行時,於該行業領域既有之行政規範。本文認為,為有效保障民眾權益,除行政機關宜力求食品安全領域相關之行政法規得以廣為周知,業者亦不可輕忽行政法規所要求之法定義務。
The Judgement about 2013 Taiwan Food Scandal was made by the Intellectual Property Court recently. The legal issue, whether the element of Fraudulence in Criminal Law had been fulfilled, was focused on the swindling. Actually, there are many types of the swindling in different businesses, and it would be necessary to appeal the administrative orders in each of businesses during the case studying. The topic in this article would be the official proclamation of administrative orders for the security of foods on the one hand. On the other hand, the dealer shall notice the legal duty according to the administrative orders.
088-101