篇名

【醫療民事法】車禍內出血死亡案:論病人與有過失之可能及類推適用【學習式判解評析】   免費試閱

並列篇名

Death Due to Internal Bleeding after Traffic Accident: The Application of Contributory Negligence, Mutatis Mutandis, To Patients

作者
中文摘要

本件最高法院判決指出在醫療過失行為發生時,病人前已受有急重症影響之損害發生或擴大,基於公平原則,應斟酌是否類推適用民法第217條規定,以減輕醫方之賠償責任。此為在醫療訴訟實務上,首見最高法院明確指出基於急重症病人身體狀況所致之危險因素,雖非與有過失,但該危險因素原存之不利益,應由病人自行承擔,而應類推適用被害人與有過失之規定。該議題甚有探討適用原理及可能類型之價值,本文即以此為評析。

英文摘要

The Supreme Court indicates that it should considerate whether paragraph 217 Civil Law would be applicated analogously on the ground of the principle of fairness to reduce the obligation of compensation on the side of the hospital, when the emergency had already affected or strengthen the patient’s damage during a medical negligence. It would be the first case in the medical legal praxis. According to which, though the situation of the emergency patients which causes danger as disinterest might not be a contributory negligence, it should be a burden the patient shall take by himself. Therefore, the regulation of contributory negligence of the victim should be applicated analogously. The gorund and the possible types of the legal issue as such might be worth to analyze and they are the topics in this essay.

起訖頁

075-091

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062020120050006  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP