篇名

刑事精神鑑定報告的效力【醫事法學教室】   免費試閱

並列篇名

Validity of Criminal Psychiatric Report

作者
中文摘要

在這幾年,殺人案件於審理上的爭執,往往不在殺人事實之有無,而是行為人於行為時是否有完全責任能力。而對行為人之責任能力的判斷,必須先確定行為時有無精神障礙;如確認有精神障礙,再決定是否因此影響其違法認識或行為控制能力。關於精神障礙有無,因涉及精神醫學的專業,而必須送請鑑定。只是精神鑑定報告對於法官的拘束力如何,卻一直是司法上的一大黑洞。本文即以案例方式,來呈現如此的問題與爭議。

英文摘要

In recent years, disputes about the trial of homicide cases are often not about the existence of the facts of the homicide, but whether the behavior is fully responsible. The judgment of responsibility ability must first determine whether there is a mental disorder during the behavior, and then decide whether it affects the understanding of illegality or the ability to control behavior after there is a mental disorder. Regarding the presence or absence of mental disorders, it is necessary to submit an appraisal due to the specialty of psychiatry. It just how binding the psychiatric appraisal report is to judges, but it has always been a big black hole in the judiciary. This article presents such problems and disputes in the form of cases.

起訖頁

117-127

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062021040054010  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP