篇名

代孕契約糾紛案:代理孕母契約到底違反了什麼規定而無效?【學習式判解評析】   免費試閱

並列篇名

Issue of Dispute Due to Surrogacy Contract: What Laws the Surrogacy Contracts Violate and Thus Make Them Invalid?

作者
中文摘要

我國對於人工生殖法與代理孕母作脫鉤立法,數十年來已為多數,立法院業於2020年5月一讀通過人工生殖法修正案,增設「代孕生殖之施行」專章,但在尚未完成三讀之前,法院實務對於代理孕母契約在民事評價上,是否宜以一貫立場認定違反民法第72條公序良俗規定為無效,或應利用此一機會無論從實體法解釋論和程序法保障上,將公序良俗概念作出更貼近社會通念對於倫理性的具體理解,值得探討。

英文摘要

It has been the majority opinion in Taiwan for decades that the legislation for artificial reproduction should divided from the surrogate motherhood. The Legislative Yuan had passed in May 2020 the amendment to the Artificial Reproduction Act, adding a special chapter on the “The Implementation of the Surrogate Motherhood”. Before it goes through the Third Reading in the Legislative Yuan to complete the legislative procedure, it is still worth exploring whether it would be appropriate for the courts to take a consistent position on the civil evaluation for the surrogate motherhood contracts and consider them invalid for violating the public order and good morals according to paragraph 72 Civil Law, or whether they should take advantage of this opportunity to make the concept of public order and good morals more closely related to the general concept of ethics in the community, both in respect of the interpretation of the substantial law as well as the procedural law.

起訖頁

069-094

出版單位
DOI

10.53106/241553062022030065006  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP