【醫療民事法】惡性胸腺腫瘤延誤診斷案:談醫療民事訴訟舉證責任之減輕與轉換【學習式判解評析】 試閱
Case Regarding Misdiagnosis of Malignant Thymoma: On the Relief and Transfer of Burden of Proof in Medical Civil
醫療民事訴訟在因果關係之舉證,實際上甚為困難,不僅因兩造對於醫療知識及證據掌握之不對等,更在於疾病之演變或可能的因果歷程發展,於醫學領域上多屬未知或難以證明。本文以民事訴訟法第條規定在醫療民事訴訟上之運作為核心,說明舉證責任之內涵;另外援引德國法觀點,比較臺、德兩地對醫病兩造訴訟地位調整方式之適用差異,最後回歸臺灣實務經驗,嘗試歸納各舉證責任調整之類型並提出本文觀察與意見。
Proving the causality is extremely difficult in Medical Civil Procedure, not only because of the different medical knowledge and proofs between the parties, but also because the development of illness and possible development of causality are still difficult to be understood or proven at medicine. The thesis in this article is an explanation of burden of proof in Medical Civil Procedure according to paragraph 227 Civil Procedure. Furthermore, viewpoints of German Law will be taken into consideration, in order to compare to the difference of adjustment of position of parties according to the Taiwanese laws. After that, the legal practical experience in Taiwan and the types of adjustment of burden of proof would be discussed. As a conclusion would be an observation and relevant opinions.
106-137