診間錄音之證據能力及證明力【醫事法學教室】 試閱
The Admissibility and the Probative Value about Recording in an Examination Room
病人私自攜帶錄音機至診間內，在未告知醫師的情況下，取得診療過程間與醫師之對話，該私人錄音原則上具有證據能力，例外於以強暴脅迫方式取得錄音之情形，則排除其證據能力。至於此類錄音可否採信，仍應視其是否具備任意性與真實性為斷，依刑事訴訟法第156條第2項規定，尚應調查其他必要之證據，以察其是否與事實相符。
A patient privately carries a tape recorder to an examination room and obtains a dialogue with the physician during the medical treatment without informing. This private recording has in principle admissibility of evidence, except for the recording obtained by violent coercion. However, whether such kinds of recording could be accepted, the arbitrariness and the authenticity shall still be regarded. According to paragragh 156 second 2 Criminal Procedure, other necessary evidence should also be investigated, in oder to proof if it is consistent with the facts.
139-143
