醫療過失侵權訴訟之舉證責任分配【醫事法學教室】   試閱

The Burden of Proof in Medical Tort Liability Lawsuits

吳淑莉

醫療過失侵權訴訟之損害賠償請求，依民事訴訟法第277條規定，原則上由原告負舉證責任，但基於醫病雙方專業地位不對等而構成顯失公平者，則得依該條但書轉換舉證責任予被告醫師，但在何種情形下構成「顯失公平」須由法院實務裁決，本案法院不採用「事實說明自己」原則，故無轉換舉證責任之必要。

According to the Article 277 of Civil Procedure Law, the burden of proof lies on the person who is making the claim in medical tort liability cases, but the burden shifts to the defendant as courts find that it is manifestly unfair to the patient. Res ipsa loquitur doctrine is not adopted in this case to shift the burden of proof to the defendant.

110-114

事實說明自己、舉證責任、醫療常規、醫療過失、res ipsa loquitur doctrine、burden of proof、medical standard of care、medical malpractice

月旦醫事法報告

202102 (52期)

元照出版公司

10.3966/241553062021020052009  複製DOI  DOI查詢

救護技術員「救護業務」之法律視角【本期企劃】

醫療暴力的預防因應：以判決實務為借鏡【醫法新論】