醫療刑事訴訟之舉證責任【醫事法學教室】 試閱
Burden of Proof in Medical Criminal Litigation
受刑事控告之被告，於未經審判證明有罪前，應被推定為無罪，此即無罪推定原則。基於公平法院原則，法院僅立於客觀、公正、中立地位審判，不負擔推翻被告無罪推定之責任，故證明被告有罪之責任，應由控訴方即檢察官承擔，由檢察官就被告具有犯罪事實，負擔舉證責任，說服法院確信被告犯罪事實之存在，而證明刑事被告有罪之證據，其證明程度須客觀上達到使通常一般人均不致於有所懷疑者，始得據以為有罪之認定。受刑事控告之被告，於未經審判證明有罪前，應被推定為無罪，此即無罪推定原則。基於公平法院原則，法院僅立於客觀、公正、中立地位審判，不負擔推翻被告無罪推定之責任，故證明被告有罪之責任，應由控訴方即檢察官承擔，由檢察官就被告具有犯罪事實，負擔舉證責任，說服法院確信被告犯罪事實之存在，而證明刑事被告有罪之證據，其證明程度須客觀上達到使通常一般人均不致於有所懷疑者，始得據以為有罪之認定。
The accused in criminal proceedings is presumed innocent until proven guilty, which is the principle of presumption of The accused in criminal proceedings is presumed innocent until proven guilty, which is the principle of presumption of innocence. The court, based on the principle of a fair court, only stands in an objective, impartial, and neutral position to try the case and does not bear the responsibility of innocence. The court, based on the principle of a fair court, only stands in an objective, impartial, and neutral position only stands in an objective, impartial, and neutral position overturning the presumption of innocence of the accused. Therefore, the burden of proving the accused’s guilt lies with the prosecution, namely the prosecutor. The prosecutor is responsible for providing evidence of the accused’s criminal conduct and convincing the court of the accused’s guilt. The standard of proof for criminal conviction requires that the evidence be so strong that a reasonable person would have no doubt about the accused’s guilt.
117-122
