醫療爭議評析的政策思考【本期企劃】 試閱
Policy Reflections on Medical Dispute Review
本文首先探索醫療事故預防及爭議處理法之立法目的與功能，並且在該法正式實施一年多後，省思為何該法最具特色的調解中評析新制使用率不高。並且針對「調解中完成評析後，仍無法成立調解之案件，評析結果與相關資料是否原則上應隨卷交由檢察官法官作後續訴訟程序參考？」這個政策上的重大爭議，提出本文的看法。
The essay first explores the legislative purpose and function of the Medical Malpractice Prevention and Dispute Resolution Act, and after more than a year of implementation of the Act, reflects on the reasons for the low utilization rate of the new system f assessment in mediation, which is the most characteristic feature of the Act. It also focuses on the question: “in cases where mediation cannot be established after the completion of the analysis in mediation, should the results of the analysis and the relevant information be submitted to the prosecutor and judge in principle for reference in the subsequent litigation process?” The opinion on this major policy controversy would be held in the essay.
053-062
