【醫療民事法】抽脂醫糾庭外和解案:和解之效力【學習式判解評析】 試閱
Reaching Settlement Out of Court Regarding Liposuction Dispute: The Effect of Settlement
醫師為病人進行腰部抽脂體雕手術時,使用非屬保暖醫療器材之烘被機為其保暖,導致燙傷,雖院方與病人已簽立協議書,但病人仍就皮膚燙傷患部之不良結果對診所及相關醫護人員起訴請求損害賠償。審理本件法院均認為病人之主張為無理由。本文試由醫糾和解之性質、範圍與效力等面向進行評析,並就院方、醫護人員及病人三方和解關係進行探討。
The defendant physician utilized during liposuction procedure the non-standard warming device, which caused burn complication to the plaintiff patient. Despite reaching settlement out of court regarding the dispute, the plaintiff still claimed for damages due to the medical malpractice herein, yet he courts held for the defendant. This article made brief comments on the nature, scope and effect of settlement about disputes regarding medical malpractice, moreover on the institute-staff-patient three-party relationship under settlement.
060-086