【醫療民事法】抽脂醫糾庭外和解案：醫療和解與錯誤【學習式判解評析】 試閱
Reaching Settlement Out of Court Regarding Liposuction Dispute: Medical Reconciliation and Error
和解應注意對象是否為告訴權人、獨立告訴權或代行告訴人，以免發生當事人資格錯誤。其次，應於事發後6個月內或在第一審言詞辯論終結前和解，方能撤回告訴；再者，醫療院所於和解時，應約定契約效力及於醫護人員或其他醫事人員，且和解範圍應明確約定包括現在及將來的損害，避免醫事人員之後再遭受訴追之困擾；另外，和解如係基於第三人意見而為之，應載明於和解契約上，日後發現第三人意見有誤，始得主張重要爭點錯誤而撤銷和解。
In order to avoid the error in the quality of parties, it should be noticed during a reconciliation whether the another party is a legal-qualified complaint or an independent complaint or an agent. Then, the complaint could only be retreated if the conciliation was made in the six months after the conflict or before the judging at the first instance. In addition, the validity of contract should stretch to the medical personnel or other medical stuff during the reconciling by the hospital. The extent of reconciliation should include the compensation of the present damage and of the damage in the future, in order to avoid the trouble that the medical personnel would be complained or be asked for compensation in the future. Furthermore, if the conciliation is based on the opinion from the third party, it should be recorded in the contract of reconciliation. By doing so, it could be argued with the error in important legal issues that the opinion was false and the reconciliation should be revoked.
087-107
