篇名

【醫療刑事法】交付審判案:論檢察官不起訴處分之外部監督──簡評臺灣新竹地方法院108年聲判更一字第1號刑事裁定   免費試閱

並列篇名

Medical Criminal Law: Setting for Trial-An External Monitor for Non-prosecutorial Disposition by the Prosecutor

作者
中文摘要

如何透過交付審判制度來對檢察官作成之不起訴處分或緩起訴處分為外部監督?其監督的界線、方式為何?是否可以由法院介入調查其他證據來認定檢察權有濫權、恣意的可能?過程中又該如何確保法院的中立性以保障被告、告訴人受公平法院之對待下進行監督?再如交付審判之案件已歷時許久,是否有其他更妥適的方法來求得國家刑罰權、被告之防禦權以及被害人權利之平衡?以上問題皆有待討論,本文藉由一則實務裁定予以分析,佐以實證法上之研究,期能為實務就交付審判制度提出一個新的因子,讓該制度更能適應臺灣法制,並落實保障人權之理念。

英文摘要

It would to be discussed in the presenting essay that how to monitor externally to a non-prosecutorial disposition or a deferred prosecution by the prosecutor, where the board of the monitor stands and how it works, i.e., how the court insists its neutrality to protect the accused as well as the complainant under the monitor by an impartial court, and furthermore, whether there could be a proper way to fulfill the state’s right to punish when the case had set for trial for a long time, and how the accused’s right to defend and the victim’s right should be balanced. Analyzing the legal praxis about the topics above with an assistance of empirical methods, the essay at hand tries to find a new factor to the setting for trial for the legal praxis and makes it adapts our circumstance to fulfill the idea of human right protecting.

起訖頁

058-074

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062020070045005  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP