篇名

有關違反食品衛生法第6條的通知是否屬行政處分之爭?   免費試閱

並列篇名

Does the Notification Due to Breaking Paragraph 6 Act Governing Food Safety and Sanitation Belong to an Administrative Disposition?

作者
中文摘要

以販賣水產品為業的原告,於2001年間欲進口冷凍燻鮪魚100公斤,依食品衛生法之規定向檢疫所長提出查驗申請,經驗出該食品每公斤中含有2370μg的一氧化碳後,檢疫所長判斷本件食品已違反食品添加物之規定,發給原告「違反食品衛生法通知書」,指示應將本件食品運回或作廢;原告不服,遂提起本件撤銷訴訟。法院於本件一、二審均指出通知書之作成非屬行政處分,惟最高法院廢棄原判決,認定該通知書具有法律上之效力,故仍可成為行政爭訟之標的。

英文摘要

The plaintiff who runs a business selling aquatic products tended to import frozen smoked tuna for 100 kilogram in 2001. After applying for the test from the lazaretto according to the rules of Act Governing Food Safety and Sanitation, the issued food had been tested that it contained Carbon monoxide for 2370 microgram pro kilogram. Believing that the rules of food additives had been broken, the chef of lazaretto notified the plaintiff as the result that he had already broken the rules, and he should take it back or destroy it. The plaintiff dissatisfied with this notification and filed a lawsuit for dismissal. Both the courts in the first and the second instance indicated that the notification was not an administrative disposition, whereas the supreme court rescinded the judgment and confirmed the notification with the legal validity. Therefore it could be a subject matter of the administrative litigation.

起訖頁

075-079

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062020070045006  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

下一篇
數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP