負責醫師容留非法執行業務人員案：論負責醫師於員工非法執行業務時之保證人地位【學習式判解評析】 試閱
A Case about a Physician in Charge of a Medical Institution Having Duty of Care
本文係對於臺灣高等法院109年度醫上易字第3號刑事確定判決之介紹與簡評，依該判決就被告即醫療機構負責醫師於容留未具執行物理治療業務資格人員，非法執行物理治療業務是否具保證人義務地位部分論述予以分析及評釋。
This essay would be an introduction as well as a comment for the appealed judgment for the medical criminal judgment No. 3 in 2020 Taiwan High Court which is forbidden appealing to the third instance. According to it, a physician in charge of a medical institution as the accused employed a stuff member who didn’t have any qualification for practicing the physical therapy. The topic being analyzed and commented in the essay would be whether it would have duty of care to practice physical therapy illegally.
096-109
