篇名

再次手術仍須填寫手術同意書、麻醉同意書   免費試閱

並列篇名

The Surgery Still Had to Fill in the Surgery Letter of Consent, the Anesthesia Letter of Consent Once More

作者
中文摘要

原告A至被告B所設立之C婦產科診所進行人工流產手術後,因手術失敗,遂而進行第二次人工流產手術。但手術後仍未墮出胎兒,反而導致子宮穿孔、併發小腸三處穿孔、腹膜炎等症狀。法院認定,被告B為A進行第二次手術時,未向意識清醒的A,或其配偶D說明手術原因、成功率或其他可能發生之併發症及危險,也未取得個該人等簽立同意書。因本案非醫療法第63條第1項但書所規定緊急狀況之例外情形,而仍受同條規定之限制,手術於取得病人或其配偶、親屬或關係人之同意並簽具同意書始得為之

英文摘要

The accused B took an artificial abortion for the plaintiff A in his obstetrics and gynecology clinic C for the second time after the first one was failed, but it still failed and caused a perforation of uterus, three places of intestinal perforation and peritonitis, etc. The judge found that B didn’t explain the reason for the second abortion, its success rate, possible complications and dangers to A and her spouse. B didn’t get any agreement in writing form the A and her family members either. This case doesn’t belong to the emergency according the proviso of Paragraph 63 Section 1 Medical Law. Paragraph 63 Section 1 Medical Law was still valid. The surgery is permitted under the circumstance of the agreement in writing of the patient or his / her spouse, family members and parties.

起訖頁

135-139

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062017050007009  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP