篇名

【醫療刑事法】心導管治療手術案:心包膜填塞的結果不法   免費試閱

並列篇名

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Complicated with Cardiac Tamponade

作者
中文摘要

裁判字號 臺灣高等法院高雄分院105年度醫上訴字第1號刑事判決
引用法條 刑法第276條、刑事訴訟法第159-5條、第369條
甲醫師為病人乙作心導管檢查,進而作心導管治療手術。手術後病人乙發生胸悶痛、血壓降低,進而突然失去意識。甲醫師除進行心肺復甦術外,並將病人推至心導管室檢查,但病人乙仍不治死亡。本案甲醫師是否履行心導管治療手術醫療常規及其注意義務?為何未能即時檢查及診斷心包膜填塞?是否得以避免病人乙之死亡?在醫療事故糾紛增多的今日,法院應如何面對,如何公正明辨是非?本案發生至今,冠狀動脈心臟病的積極治療,在A醫院幾乎形同放棄。

英文摘要

Cardiologist performed percutaneous coronary intervention on patient, but complicated with chest tightness, hypotension, and then loss of consciousness. Patient died after resuscitation and re-examination of the coronary arteries conditions. Did the doctor treat this patient according to the standard of care? Could he make diagnosis of cardiac tamponade in time? Could the death of the patient be avoided? How the courts face this trial? From the beginning of this trial till now, this hospital abandoned invasive treatment to patients with coronary artery disease.

起訖頁

066-104

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062017090011006  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP