篇名

從中國民法典各分編(草案)第995條談臨床醫療強制干預權的失範   免費試閱

並列篇名

Discussion of Irregular Mandatory Intervention Right of Clinical Medical Treatment from Perspective of Article 995 of Chinese Drafting Civil Code Sections

作者
中文摘要

中國侵權責任法第56條,係完整地複製成中國民法典各分編(草案)第995條,學界有誤讀為臨床醫療強制干預權之授權條文。本文建議在民法典編纂中有所完善,專條規制臨床醫療強制干預權。法條建議為:「患者病情危急,必須採取的不可替代的搶救措施經規範告知和解釋後,依然被患方無理拒絕,則醫療機構應當立即報告當地警務部門和衛生主管部門。警務部門和衛生主管部門應立即派員現場了解情況,協助引導。必要時,指導醫療機構向醫療機構所在地初級人民法院提交速裁申請,由法院派員現場開庭予以裁定是否啟動臨床醫療強制干預權。具體細則,另行制定。」

英文摘要

As Article 56 of Tort Law is completely reproduced as Article 995 of Chinese Drafting Civil Code Sections, some scholars in the academic circle misunderstand it as an enabling clause for mandatory intervention right of clinical medical treatment. In this paper, when civil code is compiled, a special clause is suggested to regulate the mandatory intervention right of clinical medical treatment. The clause suggests: “if the patient who is in a critical condition still rejects without a good reason the first-aid measures that are irreplaceable and necessary to be taken after being informed and explained in a formal manner, medical institution shall immediately report to the local police department and the competent health department, which shall immediately dispatch personnel to the scene and understand what happen, as well as assist in guidance. When necessary, the medical institution shall be instructed to apply for fast trial with the primary people’s court where the medical institution is located, and the court shall dispatch the personnel and hold a field court to determine whether to start the mandatory intervention right of clinical medical treatment. Specific rules will be formulated separately.”

起訖頁

167-177

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062018110025013  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP