篇名

【醫療刑事法】藥師與密醫罪案:論醫事人員義務違反之歸責性   免費試閱

並列篇名

Case of Pharmacist and Fake Doctors: On the Obligation for the Breach of Duty of Medical Personnel

作者
中文摘要

本件消費者購買驗孕棒自行檢測,依結果顯示認為沒有懷孕,購買屬處方藥之事後避孕藥,藥師未取得處方箋即予販賣,其販賣處方藥之行為,究係屬調劑程序要件欠缺,依藥事法第50條受行政罰鍰處分已足?抑或係執行醫療業務,而該當醫師法第28條之構成要件,而應負密醫罪之刑事責任?本件歷審法院判決從有罪到無罪,甚具啟發性,本文乃參酌歷審判決理由,由醫療行為、藥師業務、處方調劑程序、驗孕試劑結果判讀等面向,以相關法律之競合關係,就本件行為之歸責性及如何適用法條,進行評析。

英文摘要

A customer bought a pregnancy test kit, having the test by herself, and the result was negative. Besides, she bought a morning-after pill which belonged to prescription, but the pharmacist sold her it without having prescription. Is the act selling prescription just a deficiency of elements of dispensing and to be punished for administrative penalty according to paragraph 50 Pharmaceutical Affairs Act? Or is this kind of act a fake doctor which is the element of paragraph 28 Physicians Act and to have a criminal obligation? This case has an instructive meaning, because it was sentenced guilty at first but not guilty in the end by courts. Comparing with the reasons of judgements, the competition between medical treatments would under the perspectives of the business of pharmacists, the procedure of dispensing, and the explanation of the pregnancy test be in this article analyzed and evaluated, including the obligation and the application of the norms.

起訖頁

066-085

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062020010039005  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP