篇名

長照契約之定性及法律適用問題──由臺灣高等法院高雄分院108年度原上字第5號判決談起   免費試閱

並列篇名

The Nature of the Long-Term Contract and the Application of Law: Evaluating the Verdict No. 5 of the Taiwan High Court Kaohsiung Branch Cour in 2019

作者
中文摘要

長照機構之經營者是否適用消費者保護法而須負無過失責任,關涉其經營之風險承擔,本判決實務如採肯定說,將對長照產業形成巨大衝擊。本文則認依長照服務之性質並不適用消費者保護;縱認仍須適用該法,法院對於相關構成要件於個案中亦須嚴格認定。

英文摘要

Whether the operators of the long-term care institutions shall apply the consumer protection act and the strict liability, which involves the risk bearing of its operation. It will be a huge impact to the long-term care industry because of this verdict. This article claims that to the long-term care service does not apply to consumer protection law given its nature. Even though the long-term care service apply strict liability, the relevant constituent elements must be strictly identified in each case.

起訖頁

060-069

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062020040042004  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP