篇名

雙側卵巢切除致不能生育案:須經病人同意的醫療選項與醫師臨床裁量衝突【學習式判解評析】   免費試閱

並列篇名

Infertility due to Bilateral Oophorectomy: Conflict between Medical Options Requiring Consent of Patient and Clinical Discretion of Physician

作者
中文摘要

對於病人自主權利法中賦予病人就醫療選項有同意權,病人已非單純被告知之對象而已,而確立病人自主決定權之法律地位,與醫療法第82條修正後所入法之醫師臨床專業裁量關係,應予釐清醫師裁量之界限係建構於踐行對病人之告知與同意,否則將使醫病關係倒退回醫療父權時代,對於病人權利戕害甚巨,法院在適用上應特別慎重。

英文摘要

Patients are not simply the subject being informed but have the legal status with the autonomy according to Patient Right to Autonomy Act which endows with the right to consent in respect of options of medical treatment. As to the clinical professional discretion which belongs to the physician according to the paragraph 28 of amended Physician Act, it shall be clarified that the purpose of the discretion of the physician lies on the information and consent of patients. Otherwise, it might force the relation between patient and physician back to the patriarchal time, causing enormous damage to patients, and it shall be cautioned during the legal application in court.

起訖頁

108-127

出版單位
DOI

10.53106/241553062022040066007  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP