篇名

醫療水準與醫療慣行之注意義務   免費試閱

並列篇名

The Medical Level and Common Medical Due Diligence

作者
中文摘要

最高法院106年度台上字第227號民事判決引入醫療水準作為注意義務標準之觀念,並非臺灣訴訟史上首倡,最高法院95年度台上字第3884號刑事判決即指出,應以「醫療當時臨床實踐之醫療水準判斷是否違反注意義務」為斷;觀察日本最高法院系列判決,亦以「診療當時臨床醫學所實踐之醫療水準」為標準,並致力於具體個案之適用,故現已積累諸多可供參考之要素。本文認為,臺灣就此或可借鏡日本,綜合考量各種因素,而非獨尊醫療慣行。

英文摘要

Before the civil judgment No. 277 (2017) of the supreme court which recognizes the medical level as the criterion for due Diligence, the criminal judgment No. 3884 (2006) of the supreme court had indicated that it would be whether the medical judgment during the medical clinical practice was broken or not. Comparing to the judgments of the supreme court in Japan, the medical level during the medical clinical practice would also be the criterion and it was applied in each single cases. There are until now many references of it consequently. Taking Japan as the reference, we should considerate each different causes, instead of emphasizing the medical convention.

起訖頁

086-095

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062017080010007  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP