從司法實務觀點論醫療上急救責任成立與義務違反【醫事法學教室】 試閱
A Study of Medical Emergency Treatment Responsibiliy Established and Obligation Violated from Judicial Practice Perspectives
本文旨在於探討醫療法上關於適當急救法定義務之司法實務認定標準。是否已履行適當急救，除須考量不同醫療機構之人員、設備與能力之差異性外，亦須斟酌生命處於立即危險的程度。本文藉由觀察四個案例，呼籲醫病之間應正視、了解司法實務對於無故拖延之禁止，即所謂的適當急救之看法與促進醫病關係和諧之重要關聯性。
The theme of this article is to discuss the judicial practice standard determination of proper emergency treatment obligation mentioned in the Medical Care Act. Not only diverse personnel, facilities, and capability among different medical care institutions should be considered, but also the level of life in immediate danger should be taken into consideration whether proper emergency treatment is implemented. By observing the four cases in this article, physicians and patients should aware and understand the important relevance between judicial practice opinion of prohibiting delay without cause, which means proper emergency treatment, and harmonious physician-patient relationship promotion.
131-138
