篇名

日本腦腫瘤診斷過失判賠案例──追加請求部分是否罹於消滅時效   免費試閱

並列篇名

A Case about Compensation for Negligence of Diagnosis of Brain Tumor in Japan: Did the Additional Complain Extinctive?

作者
中文摘要

本件原告主張A大學醫院之身心內科醫師等人,於2006年10月30日讀取其頭部電腦斷層掃描檢查報告書時,未診斷出其已罹患腦腫瘤,使其因腦腫瘤增大併發水腦症。原告先於2013年提告請求損害賠償,至2015年6月3日,原告之症狀固定,經鑑定為身心障礙等級二級,原告遂於同年8月10日提出擴張請求,並於2019年2月25日再提出律師費之擴張請求。本件所涉爭點包括因果關係之有無、損害賠償金額之認定,以及律師費之擴張請求是否已罹於時效等。

英文摘要

The plaintiff complained a physician who was the psychosomatic clinic of a clinical center at the university A for he didn’t diagnose that the plaintiff had already had a brain tumor when reading a report of computed tomography for his head. The tumor had increased and caused hydrocephalus as a consequence. The plaintiff had complained for compensation in 2013. His syndrome had been confirmed as the second level disability according to the appraisal on June 3rd 2015. The plaintiff had complained additionally for compensation on August 10th in the same year and for the attorney fee on February 25th in 2019. The legal issues in this case are whether there was the causality, the confirmation about the range of compensation and whether the addition complain for the attorney fee had already extinctive.

起訖頁

145-151

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062019120038010  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP