篇名

醫師涉嫌作出虛偽診斷書   免費試閱

並列篇名

The Physician Suspected of Making False Diagnosis

作者
中文摘要

本案被告醫師涉嫌為使暴力集團組長免遭收押,向檢方提出虛偽之診斷書,後遭檢方起訴求刑。二審法院認為診斷書之內容無須為「確定性判斷」,被告醫師雖非採取醫學上常用之診斷方法,然其基於經驗作成之推論,仍未違背事實。被告醫師採用舊有之檢查結果,充其量僅係說明不夠充分,難謂其記載為虛偽。二審法院最終維持一審之被告無罪判決,駁回檢方抗告。

英文摘要

The physician as the accused in this case gave the prosecutor the false diagnosis to let the leader of a violence group escape from being demented. Then he was accused for penalties. The court in the second instance found that it wouldn’t be necessary to be a deterministic judgement in a diagnosis. Even though the diagnostic method the accused had used was unusual in medicine, the inference made by him was based on the experience and wasn’t untruth. In fact, it would only be insufficient for the explanation due to adopting the old result, and be hard to be a false record. In the end, the court in the second instance rejected the counterappeal from the prosecutor and maintained the judgement in the first instance that the accused was innocent.

起訖頁

142-147

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062020050043010  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP