【醫療刑事法】嗆奶窒息案:醫療照護疏失之過失不純正不作為犯認定【學習式判解評析】 試閱
The Case of Asphyxia caused by Choking Milk: The Judgment of the unreal Failure to Discharge a Legal Duty Due to the Negligence of Medical Care
醫療訴訟勝敗往往取決於鑑定結果,對於鑑定的提問與理解是檢察官、法官必備的技能,然而實務上仍常見對於鑑定問題背景知識不足或被誤導,而為無效問題之提問,更甚者對於鑑定報告錯誤之解讀,導致大相逕庭的判決結論,尤其牽涉不純正不作為犯關於結果廻避可能性及準因果關係之認定,更須要以科學證據為基礎不能有悖於罪疑惟輕原則。
It depends often on the result of the assessment to win the medical lawsuit. It is therefore necessary to the prosecutors and the judges to be able to inquire and understand the result of the assessment. However, there were sometimes invalid inquiry in the legal praxis because of lacking of background knowledge or being misled. Furthermore were there false understanding of the result of the assessment, causing the judgment which was divergent from the common sense. Concerning the unreal failure to discharge a legal duty, it is additionally about the judgment of the possibility of eliminating risky result and the quasi causality that the nursing stuff had done. An inquiry and a doubt about the medical professional knowledge the court has might not be excluded. They should be based on the scientific evidence to follow the principle in dubio pro reo.
068-086