篇名

日本集體食物中毒事件後續撤銷訴訟   免費試閱

並列篇名

The Litigation to Revoke an Administrative Act after the Collective Foodborne Disease in Japan

作者
中文摘要

本件原告因違反食品衛生法第6條,而遭被告依同法第55條勒令停業14天。原告雖於停業期間過後提出撤銷訴訟,主張在「食物中毒處理要點」中,對業者的限制應隨危險範圍逐漸明朗與釐清,而有所相應解除。因此,當食物中毒之責任歸屬已釐清為T社而非原告,則應盡快撤銷該停業處分,以免日後之不利益。和歌山地方法院認為,縱已過停業期間,該處分仍會影像日後處分之加重,因此仍有法律上利益。此外,該停業處分之書面記載,均未記載處分之原因事實,不符行政訴訟法之書面要求,故認定原告主張有理由而撤銷該處分。

英文摘要

The plaintiff was sanctioned by the accused to cease trading for fourteen days according to paragraph 55 Food Sanitation Act because of breaking paragraph 6 of the same law. After the period of ceasing trading, the plaintiff held a litigation to revoke the administrative sanction, arguing that the restriction to the trader should accordingly be lifted, since the range of danger has been clarified. Therefore when the responsibility belonged to the company T instead of the plaintiff, the administrative sanction to cease trading should be revoked to avoid the disadvantage in the future. Wakayama District Court insisted however that though the period of ceasing trading had been completed, the administrative sanction which might cause the aggravated sanction had legal interest. Besides, it didn’t match the requirement according to Administrative Procedure that no reason had been written down on the sanction as an official document. The argue the plaintiff held was reasonable and the administrative sanction should be revoked consequently.

起訖頁

087-091

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062020110049006  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP