國民法官面對精神鑑定的難題──以臺鐵殺警案為操作模型【本期企劃】 試閱
The Difficulties of the Psychiatric Expertise the Lay Judges Faced: Taking the Case of the Killed Railway Police As an Operational Model
國民法官上路在即,第一階段遇到的案件類型以「故意犯罪因而發生死亡結果者」,對應到司法實務以殺人罪為多數;而近年多起殺人案件中,不乏見到被告提出刑法第19條責任能力的抗辯,使法院必須透過精神鑑定來找到答案。但如果有複數鑑定意見時該如何評價?甫確定的臺鐵殺警案中對不同鑑定意見有詳細的說明,未來國民法官遇到這類案件是否能提前因應,為本文欲探究之疑。
The institution of the lay judges would be in practice. The cases for them would be in the first stage attentional crime leading death. It would mostly be in the legal praxis the homicide. However there were recently many accused who defended with the responsibility according to paragraph 19 Criminal Law in this kind of cases, and the court had to find answer by the psychiatric expertise. It might be problematic to evaluate if there were multi-results of the authentication. The case of the killed railway police which have just had final verdict had detailed explanation for the different opinions of the authentications. How could the lay judges by facing this kind of cases have preparations in advance?
022-033