篇名

保全業過勞認定──臺灣士林地方法院108年度勞訴字第61號民事判決評析【醫法新論】   免費試閱

並列篇名

Recognition of Burnout in the Security Industry—Analysis of the Judgment for 2019 Labor Lawsuit Civil Case No. 61 by Shilin District Court of Taiwan

作者
中文摘要

過勞是職業促發腦血管及心臟疾病之俗稱,藉由評析實務判決,本文對以下爭點進行討論:不同指引間對加班工時認定的歧異、法院對於保全業過勞認定之觀點、法院與醫師認定歧異之分析。另區分職災補償及損害賠償之差異,闡釋職災補償採無過失責任主義之精神,故職業傷病的認定實應視為勞工之保障,而非雇主之懲罰。本文認為加班工時之起算基準應為每月176小時,才有實證醫學上的基礎,並應綜合考量工作時數之質性與工作型態之量性因素。

英文摘要

"Burnout" is the commonly known term for cerebrovascular and heart diseases that are caused by one’s job. Through an analysis of the practical judgment, this text examines the following points: the inconsistency between the definition of “Overtime hours” in different guidelines, the court’s viewpoint of the recognition of Burnout among security workers, and an analysis of the conflicting viewpoint between the court and the doctors. In addition, this text distinguishes between compensation for occupational injury and penalty for damages and explains the spirit of strict liability in occupational accidents compensation, which therefore means that the recognition of occupational injuries should be seen as labor protection rather than a penalty for employers. In this study, it is recommended that the calculation of overtime hours should still be counted starting from 176 hours every month if it is based on evidence-based medicine and should consider as a whole the "qualitative" factor of working hours and the "quantitative" factor of the form of work.

起訖頁

144-164

出版單位
DOI

10.53106/241553062021120062011  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP