醫師急救義務與過失犯理論的耦合【醫法新論】 試閱
Physician’s Emergency Treatment Obligations and Negligence Theory of Crime
本文針對醫師法第21條與醫療法第60條第1項醫師的急救義務進行討論，首先，筆者認為，醫師的急救義務僅在其執行業務時方有適用餘地，而不及於非執業狀態。至於醫師在非執業狀態下的緊急救護行為，則應適用緊急醫療救護法的規定內容加以定性。另外，醫師在執行業務的狀況下，如果違反急救義務時，本文認為已經創造了法所不容許的風險，依照我國目前通說之見解，將構成刑事過失不法。
This article discusses the obligations of physicians under the Physicians Act and the Medical Care Act. First, the emergency treatment obligations of physicians are applicable only when they are performing their business, and not when they are not in practice. As for the emergency medical care behavior of the physicians in the nonpracticing state, it should be qualified by applying the provisions of the Emergency Medical Services Act. In addition, the physicians in the performance of business, if the breach of emergency obligations, it has created the risk of the law does not allow, in accordance with the current scholars’ insights, will constitutes a negligence crime.
146-164
