篇名

論我國最近十年之預防接種受害救濟行政訴訟—從完全不可能勝訴到現今之改變【一百期特別企劃】   試閱

並列篇名

Comments on the 10 Years' Transition of Proceedings in the Vaccine Injury Compensation— From Desperation to Justice

作者
中文摘要

本研究以2011年區分前後期,對預防接種救濟訴訟進行實證分析,前期之民眾從未有過勝訴之紀錄,進入後期民眾之勝訴判決開始出現,除固有之因果關係判定原則及舉證責任仍持續為重要爭點外,後期之原告所主張之訴訟爭點則大幅擴張至救濟審議辦法新舊法之適用爭執、救濟審議小組之小組成員資格與實質審議能力、審議會議之具體審議程序、受救濟之態樣、請求再審、請求再送鑑定等,法院有了更多程序與實質上之具體審議,同時針對救濟之審議提出應有之原則。法院進行多方面之實質性審議,不僅得以確保個案民眾之預防接種受救濟權利,對於未來之預防接種救濟案件之審議,也有提示重要原則之重大意義。

英文摘要

After 2011, about the vaccination relief litigation, people’s winning judgments began to appear. Besides the inherent causality determination principle and the burden of proof, the plaintiffs claims were greatly expanded to disputes over the application of the new and old laws on relief review methods, the qualifications and substantive review capabilities of the relief review team, the specific review procedures of the review meeting, etc., the court has more procedural and substantive specific deliberation and proposes principles for deliberation. This not only ensures the people’s right to receive vaccination relief, but also provides guidance for future vaccination relief cases. Deliberation also has the effect of providing key points and principles.

起訖頁

077-095

出版單位
DOI

10.53106/241553062025020100005  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP