篇名

【醫療民事法】依身心障礙者權利公約裁定停止強制住院:被遺漏的自主、平等與比例原則論述   免費試閱

並列篇名

Decision to Discontinue the Execution of Compulsory Admission according to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Sadly Omitted Discourses in Autonomy, Equality, and Principles of Proportionality

作者
中文摘要

根據身心障礙者權利公約,對當事人裁定強制住院,應考量其自主之意願。然而,該公約的解釋與適用如何,於實務上仍容有疑義。本文就臺灣桃園地方法院駁回療養院所執行強制住院之裁定,進行法律政策與法律釋義兩個不同面向的評析,探討身心障礙者權利公約與臺灣精神衛生法於強制住院措施與當事人自主意願尊重之張力。簡言之,原裁定於事實上之審酌或可更臻明確外,亦應注意該公約與既有法制之間的體系關係,以求更好的法規範解釋。

英文摘要

The autonomy of a party shall be considerated according to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, when the court decides the party shall receive compulsory admission. However, there are still problems in the explaination and application of the convention in legal praxis. Based on perspectives in legal policy and legal dogmatics, this article analyzes the decision of Taiwan Taoyuan District Court that rejected the enforcement of compulsory admission by a psychiatric hospital. It addresses the tension between compulsory admission and respect for autonomy as revealed in the encounter between the convention and the Mental Health Act in Taiwan. In summary, to enhance the quality of legal norm interpretation, the court decision not only should have deliberated more clearly on the relevant fact, but also should have paid more attention to issues of systematic coherence between the convention and the current legal institution in Taiwan.

起訖頁

083-97

期數
出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062018030017007  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路18 號 5 樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP