篇名

【醫療民事法】依身心障礙者權利公約裁定停止強制住院:外國月亮一定比較圓?   免費試閱

並列篇名

Decision to Discontinue the Execution of Compulsory Admission according to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: The Grass is Always Greener on the Other Side of the Fence?

作者
中文摘要

臺灣桃園地方法院106年度衛字第4號民事裁定指出,現行精神衛生法中強制住院制度牴觸了身心障礙者權利公約第14條及聯合國身心障礙者權利委員會之一般意見,且依據身心障礙者權利公約施行法第10條第2項規定,不應再予適用。如此法律適用之論述是否妥適,則為本文所欲分析的重點。要言之,精神衛生法強制住院─是否及如何為之─並未當然牴觸身心障礙者權利公約及一般性意見;相較而言,如何善用身心障礙者權利公約第46條之保留制度,以與國內法制相融合,避免基本權利受到侵害,更是值得關注。

英文摘要

The contemporary compulsory admission in the Mental Health Act shall be abolished because it is against the paragraph 14 of Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) and the general comment of United Nation. It would be the main topic in this article, whether this kind of legal opinion would be proper. Being summarized, the compulsory admission in the Mental Health Act – whether and how does it be applied – doesn absolutely transgress CRPD and the general comment of it. As a comparison would it be rather one of regarded topics, how does the paragraph 46 of CRPD be interpreted and be applied to integrate with national laws.

起訖頁

098-110

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062018030017016  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP