篇名

論「延長工作時間」或「值日(夜)」之認定與區別:以醫師助理/專科護理師請求加班費一案為例   免費試閱

並列篇名

On the Identification of the Extended Working Hours and Regular/Night Shift and Their Difference: The Case of Claim for Overtime-Payment by Physician Assistants and Specialist Nurses as an Example

作者
中文摘要

勞工之工作時間,若為延長工作時間,雇主則應依勞動基準法第2 4 條之規定給付加班費; 若為值日( 夜) , 雇主應給付值日( 夜) 津貼, 至於值日(夜)津貼之金額,則由勞雇雙方議定之。本文將介紹一則從事專科護理師工作內容之醫師助理,主張其值班乃屬延長工作時間,向雇主請求加班費,但雙方對值班屬延長工作時間或值日(夜)有所爭執之判決。本件之爭點涉及延長工作時間與值日(夜)等概念,本文擬藉此判決探討延長工作時間與值日(夜)之認定與區別。

英文摘要

If the working hours is extended, the employer should pay for overtime according to paragraph 24 Labor Standard Law. If it would be regular / night shift, the employer should pay allowance of it and it is agreed by both of the employee and the employer. A judgement is introduced in this article that physician assistants working as nurse practitioners claimed for overtime-payments which was based on shifts as extended working hours. However, there still was an argument about it. The legal issue is the concepts of extended working hours and of regular / night shifts. It would be discussed how they could be identified and be different.

起訖頁

130-134

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062018060020011  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP