篇名

未婚父母訴請獨自承擔對其未成年子女的健康照護決定權   免費試閱

並列篇名

The Unmarried Parent Complained for Having Alone the Authority to the Health Care of Their Minor Child

作者
中文摘要

本件爭點為一對沒有婚姻關係的夫妻對於2012年出生的女兒負有照顧義務,卻於必要的疫苗預防接種有意見不一致之情事,父母雙方均向法院主張自己對其女兒擁有獨自的健康照護決定權。根據德國民法第1628條及第1687條,父母之一方若較他方所為之決定對子女更符合子女之利益,則具有決定權。法院亦肯定,子女之疫苗接種屬於重大事務。又,德國聯邦醫學中心疫苗接種委員會的建議基於專業知識而來,因此無須另行聽取專家鑑定人之意見。本件之父親對於疫苗接種保持開放態度,且其行為依循德國聯邦醫學中心疫苗接種委員會的建議,使之更顯得合適承擔子女之重大事務決定權。

英文摘要

It is in this judgment about an unmarried couple who has duty to care of the safety of their daughter who was born in 2012 has different opinions about whether her shall have a necessary vaccination. Both of the parent claimed to the family court about the authority to decide the care of the daughter. According to paragraph 1628 and 1687 German Civil Code, one of the parent who has a better decision to the interest of children has the authority. The family court also confirmed that the vaccination of children belongs to major affairs. The advice of having a vaccination which was made by Commission of Vaccination in Federal Medical Center was furthermore based on professional knowledge, so there is no need to investigate with identification. As conclusion, the father in this case was open with vaccinations and obeyed the advice of Commission of Vaccination; it made him apparently be appropriate to have the authority to decide major affairs for his child.

起訖頁

117-124

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062019040030009  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP