觀察勒戒與毒品戒癮緩起訴處分之間的選擇【醫事法學教室】 試閱
The Choice between Observation and Deferred Prosecution of Drug Abstention
觀察勒戒與毒品戒癮緩起訴處分，有論者認為係屬「雙軌制」之處遇模式，惟何者有利於被告？依臺灣高等法院暨所屬法院2017年法律座談會刑事類提案第37號可知並不能一概而論，對於具成癮性的施用毒品行為而言，處遇的迅速性本具相當之重要性，從而對於檢察官在兩者間的選擇仍宜給予適度尊重。又，關於應如何在觀察勒戒與毒品戒癮緩起訴處分之間抉擇的問題，宜尊重醫學專業，必要時並調查相關證據，作為檢察官裁量時參考之用，方屬周延。
Some believe that observation and deferred prosecution of drug abstention are a double track system of the treatment, but which one is beneficial to the defendant? According to the Criminal Proposal No. 37 of the Legal Symposium of Taiwan High Court and the subordinating Courts in 2017, there couldn’t be a generalized applicability. For the addictive drug application, due to considerable importance of the rapidity of the treatment, the prosecutor’s choice between these two should be given modestly respect. Also regarding the question of how to choose between observation and deferred prosecution of drug abstention, it is advisable to respect the medical professionality, and to investigate relevant evidence as reference for the discretion of prosecutor if necessary. Therefore, it could be said an exhaustive consideration.
123-128
