淺談國民法官案件就複數精神鑑定之處理【醫法新論】 試閱
Multiple Psychiatric Expertise in Citizen Judges Case
如何協助國民法官理解精神鑑定報告，進而就責任能力進行妥適判斷，已屬難題，遑論若該國民法官案件存在複數精神鑑定報告之情況。本文透過介紹日本近年可資參考之裁判員裁判案件一則並進行分析，嘗試就如何協力國民法官審查複數精神鑑定報告提出淺見，並嘗試從觀察角度之不同便可能會導致責任能力判斷結果不同，論述對於複數鑑定聲請之准否，以及為何不宜將認定責任能力之「終極問題」委由鑑定人判斷。
It is difficult to assist citizen judges to understand a psychiatric expertise, not to mention the situation there are multiple psychiatric expertise in the case. This article introduces and analyzes a case of a citizen judges case in Japan, and attempts to give an opinion on how to assist citizen judges in reviewing multiple psychiatric expertise, and to discuss the criteria for granting or denying the claim of multiple psychiatric expertise, and why it is not appropriate to ask the “ultimate issue” to psychiatric expert.
132-150
