篇名

電波拉皮手術和解案:對重要爭點有錯誤而成立和解之撤銷與解除【學習式判解評析】   試閱

並列篇名

The Settlement in Thermage Facelift Dispute: Where is the Future of Taiwan National Health Insurance’s Tiered Medical Care System Heading?

作者
中文摘要

成立和解契約之要素包含法律關係不明確與互相讓與性約定,欠缺其一,縱為終止或防止爭執發生而為拋棄權利或承擔義務之約定,該約定雖屬有效,但仍非和解。是雙方藉成立和解契約所歸整之基礎法律關係應去除不明確狀態,在與真實不符時,原則不得撤銷,就基礎法律關係之爭點以經當事人雙方合意或有表示於外部經社會交易觀念認為重要者為例外得撤銷,但就互讓所決定之事項並不在得以錯誤為理由撤銷之列。此外,和解得以一方行使法定或約定解除權,或由雙方合意解除,或附解除條件成就時,失其效力。本件訴訟主張及法院判決就和解之成立要件與撤銷事由俱值參考討論,有藉以探明和解契約之成立、撤銷與解除要件之實益。

英文摘要

The elements of a settlement contract include the uncertainty of the legal relationship and the mutual agreement of concessions. Without one of them , the contract is not a settlement but still valid, even if it is an agreement of waiver of rights or obligations to terminate or prevent the occurrence of a dispute. The underly legal relationship between the parties through setting a settlement contract shall be removed from the uncertainty and shall not be revoked in principle if it doesn’t correspond to the truth, except that the dispute over the underlying legal relationship may be revoked if it is deemed important by the parties’ mutual consent or if it is expressed externally by the social concept of trade, but it may be revoked, if it is determined by mutual transfer and is not revoked on the grounds of mistake. In addition, a settlement may be voided by the exercise of a statutory or a contractual release by one of the parties, by mutual consent, or by the fulfillment of conditions attached to the release. The claim in this litigation and the judgement on the elements of the settlement and the grounds for revocation are worthy of reference and discussion, in order to explore the worth of the elements of the formation, revocation and the release of a settlement contract.

起訖頁

077-097

出版單位
DOI

10.53106/241553062024010087006  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP